Conclusion
Some users think that benchmarks are the be all and end all, which to a certain degree, yes. They show distinct patterns of how a certain piece of hardware performs and is obviously good for comparison purposes, but it all really does come down to the applications or games that you’re planning to run.
In the benchmarks, it shows amazing results when comparing it to a similar Intel CPU, coming out on top through most tests, and from our own personal experience of using it for video rendering and playing high intensity games, it didn’t skip a beat giving us quick results with no faults.
At the time of writing this review, we can only assume it will come in at the same price that the 1090T did at just over £200 but these are only assumptions of course.
If you are in the market for a processor that is going to handle lots of intense tasks at once and able to handle huge loads such as video rendering, this is definitely the processor for you.
Pros:
- Six physical cores
- Potential to overclock
- Fairly high clock speed
- Turbo clock of 3.7GHz
Cons:
- None
Ratings:
- Design – 9
- Features – 9
- Performance – 10
- Value – 8
- Overall – 9
190 doesn`t sound so bad for that 3.6 turbo speed. but when we`ll see stock speed from AMD at least 3.8 at this price then i`ll consider it 🙂
why not make stable 4 point 0 😀 GHz CPU? Naah Whole pace gathered by the competition between Intel and AMD is good for prices of older models. But what with multi threaded apps? You pay for the 6cores and only few of apps can take advantage of it? That's why i'm using x2 low power CPU in my HTPC. Am I wrong when i will say that i can count those apps with all my fingers ? BTW 190Ł holy smokey! that's almost whole my computer price 😀
I bet you can clock that up even higher, but still, any 6 core processor is beast. I love AMD processors, so cheaply sold which makes it good for people like me. Great review, thank you.