News

Apple Stops Facebook from Disclosing its 30% App Store Fee

As you may be aware, Apple and Epic Games are currently in the opening sessions of what will undoubtedly be a long legal battle over the former’s policy of taking a 30% cut of any app store purchases. In a report via TechSpot, however, it seems that another dispute with Apple may be set to boil over.

Who is it this time? Well, apparently Facebook attempted to disclose that Apple takes money (their cut) from purchases made on one of its new features. They have, however, since been told to remove it as it violates store terms as ‘irrelevant’ information.

Apple VS Facebook!

Facebook recently launched a new feature allowing users to host online paid events. Specifically, so that people could attempt to make some money while in COVID-19 lockdown. Sounds good right? Well, apparently despite approaching them, an agreement couldn’t be reached with Apple for them to drop their 30% cut (so all the money could go to the user).

So, what did Facebook do? They decided to disclose this information with an “Apple takes 30% of this purchase” disclaimer on any relevant payment page. As you might have guessed, this decision did not go down well with the tech giant.

“That’s Irrelevant”

Apple has since forced Facebook to remove this disclaimer by, somewhat amusingly, describing it as being against their store policy as ‘irrelevant information’. In an official statement, Facebook has said:

“Now more than ever, we should have the option to help people understand where money they intend for small businesses actually goes. Unfortunately Apple rejected our transparency notice around their 30% tax but we are still working to make that information available inside the app experience.”

Now, exactly what Facebook will do regarding this is unclear. It does, however, seem that we have yet another company who is growing more than a little sick of Apple’s financial policy of making sure it always has a finger in any IOS related pie! I mean, could Epic Games find itself getting a new and unexpected ally in its legal battle?… I wouldn’t be surprised!

What do you think? – Let us know in the comments!

Mike Sanders

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

BenQ MOBIUZ EX2710Q 27″ QHD 165Hz 1ms, HDRi IPS Gaming Monitor

SpeakersSpeakersYesSpeaker amount and power output2x 2 WattDimensionsLength / Depth252.5 mmWidth614 mmHeight525.8 mmWeight7.4 kgStandards / SpecificationsAdaptive…

2 hours ago

Intel Core i7-12700KF 3.60GHz Socket LGA1700 Processor

Thermal SpecificationsMax. TDP125 WCPUCPU ManufacturerIntelCPU SeriesIntel Core i7CPU Socket1700CPU ArchitectureIntel Alder Lake-SCPU Cores12CPU Threads20Performance Cores8Efficiency…

2 hours ago

AOC 24B3HA2 24″ 1920×1080 VA 100Hz 1m Widescreen LED Multimedia Monitor 

AOC 24B3HA2 23.6 1920x1080 VA 100Hz 1m Widescreen LED Multimedia Monitor - Black High-performance clarity…

2 hours ago

Corsair Hydro Series iCUE Link H115i RGB Performance Liquid CPU Cooler

Fan SpecificationsFan Size140 mmColourPrimary ColourBlackSecondary ColourWhiteMaterialsMaterialsAluminium, Copper, RubberLightingLightingYesLighting ColourRGBLighting CompatibilityCorsair iCUEAdditional ContentsIncluded fans2x 140 mmTypeCPU…

2 hours ago

Philips Evnia 34″ 34M2C6500/00 3440×1440 QD-OLED 175Hz 1ms FreeSync Curved Ultrawide Gaming Monitor

This monitor is built with features that make incredible visuals. With VESA ClearMR 9000 and…

2 hours ago

Asus Radeon RX 7900 XTX TUF OC 24GB GDDR6 PCI-Express Graphics Card

The AMD RDNA™ 3 Architecture elevated by buffed cooling and power delivery to effortlessly churn…

2 hours ago