Motherboards

ASUS ROG Strix X870-I Gaming WIFI Motherboard Review

VRM Analysis

The STRIX X870-I Gaming WIFI is the only board from ASUS that features a 10-layer PCB, compared to the typical 8-layer that we’d see on ATX-sized motherboards. This is done for a few reasons, with one of the main points being space constraints.

ITX boards are significantly smaller, so they have less surface area for routing power, signals, and ground planes. A higher number of layers helps accommodate more traces and connections within a smaller footprint, reducing congestion and signal interference.

Also, ITX boards, especially high-performance ones, need efficient power delivery systems due to their limited space. Extra PCB layers allow for better distribution of power, separating power and ground planes, which is important for maintaining stability under heavy loads.

With more layers, ITX motherboards can also better manage high-speed signals like PCIe, memory, and USB and additional layers allow for improved signal integrity by dedicating specific layers for high-speed data routing and providing better electromagnetic shielding.

The added layers also help to distribute heat more effectively, which is important in small form factor boards where airflow is somewhat limited. This aids in keeping components cool even in compact cases with restricted cooling.

Also, due to the smaller size, we typically see smaller phase counts, though the X870-I still manages to pack a punch with a 10+2+1 design that utilises Vishay SiC850A 110A Smart power stages or SPS phases. There isn’t a ton of information out there on these power stages, but they have been used before on some of ASUS’ X670E boards, like the Crosshair Hero for instance.

The bulk of the phases are controlled by the Infineon ASP2205 PWM controller. Again, a part that ASUS have utilised before, along with a Richtek RT3672EE synchronous buck controller for the single miscellaneous phase, and this is actually a common trend that we found across most of the X870 and X870E boards that we tested utilising the same controller because it fully meets AMD’s SVI3 requirements.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Peter Donnell

As a child still in my 30's (but not for long), I spend my day combining my love of music and movies with a life-long passion for gaming, from arcade classics and retro consoles to the latest high-end PC and console games. So it's no wonder I write about tech and test the latest hardware while I enjoy my hobbies!

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

Intel’s Latest Beta GPU Driver Comes With More Issues Than Improvements

Intel has just dropped a brand new update for its Arc GPU graphics drivers, but…

1 day ago

Epomaker Announces the Galaxy 100 Programmable Keyboard

The latest keyboard from Epomaker is here, with the Galaxy 100, a $110 fully customisable…

1 day ago

CORSAIR Launches iCUE LINK LX-R RGB Reverse Fans

Corsair has just announced the LX-R RGB Series, a new line of reverse-flow cooling fans…

1 day ago

NVIDIA Reveals New Games That Support DLSS 3 and Ray Tracing

NVIDIA has revealed the new games that support its latest graphics card technologies. We're talking…

2 days ago

Apple M4 Max Outperforms RTX 4070 and RTX 3080 Ti in Blender Test

The Apple M4 Max, the high-end option among the new Apple processors that launched in…

2 days ago

Intel Core Ultra 200 Non-K CPUs Spotted in Canadian Retail Listing

As Intel prepares to expand its Core Ultra 200 series of processors with “non-K” models,…

2 days ago