Examining AMD’s Driver Progress Since Launch




/ 10 years ago

« Previous Page

Final Thoughts


amd_radeon

So there you have it: you’ve seen the results from each of the games we tested comparing release drivers to current drivers and you’ve seen the performance gains. To summarise they are as follows:

  • In 3DMark the HD 7970 gained 30.8% in FireStrike and 28.9% in FireStrike Extreme while the R9 290X gained 2.5% in FireStrike and there was no change in FireStrike Extreme.
  • In Battlefield 4 the HD 7970 gained 19.9% while the R9 290X gained 1.3%.
  • In Bioshock Infinite the HD 7970 gained 15.4% while the R9 290X saw no change.
  • In Metro Last Light the HD 7970 gained 6.4% while the R9 290X gained 1.8%.
  • In Sleeping Dogs the HD 7970 gained 9.2% while the R9 290X saw no change.
  • In Tomb Raider the HD 7970 gained 6.6% while the R9 290X saw no change.

The broad trend that we can see was not unexpected in the slightest. The HD 7970 has made some significant performance gains across most games and benchmarks because the HD 7970 was the first graphics card of a new architecture, the 28nm GCN design. The gains that have been seen with the HD 7970 are mainly architectural ones and that is why they are so high. For three years worth of driver progress there are some impressive gains in performance, such as in Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs. Of course, the R9 290X is totally the opposite. Because it uses the same architecture as the HD 7970 all the optimisations had already been made by the time it was released in October 2013: nearly 2 years on from the HD 7970’s release. As a result we see very little change from driver updates with most games and benchmarks showing no change, or a 2.5% or less boost in performance.

On the whole I think it is fair to say driver updates can make a huge difference: anyone comparing reviews of the HD 7970 to the R9 280X may be misled by the results: the R9 280X is faster because reviews are based on newer drivers will all the architectural optimisations. The same applies to anyone comparing HD 7000 series cards with their R9 2xx series equivalents, such as the HD 7950 and the R9 280 or the HD 7870 and the R9 270X. AMD has done a great job with its driver updates in terms of performance gains. From now on forward I doubt we’ll see any more performance increases for GCN 1.0 and 1.1 based cards, most newly released driver updates will just be bug fixes for things like game issues with new games or problems with CrossFireX profiles and frame latency issues.

I hope you have found this article interesting, please stay tuned for our Nvidia driver analysis article where will do the same to Nvidia’s two flagship cards: the GTX 680 from the GTX 600 series and the GTX 780 Ti from the GTX 700 series. We will also be comparing and contrasting the AMD and Nvidia results to see who really does the best job with driver optimisations!

Thank you to all our partners who provided the hardware and software that made this driver analysis possible.

« Previous Page


Topics: , , , , , , , ,

Support eTeknix.com

By supporting eTeknix, you help us grow and continue to bring you the latest newsreviews, and competitions. Follow us on FacebookTwitter and Instagram to keep up with the latest technology news, reviews and more. Share your favourite articles, chat with the team and more. Also check out eTeknix YouTube, where you'll find our latest video reviews, event coverage and features in 4K!

Looking for more exciting features on the latest technology? Check out our What We Know So Far section or our Fun Reads for some interesting original features.

eTeknix Facebook eTeknix Twitter eTeknix Instagram eTeknix Instagram
  • Be Social With eTeknix

    Facebook Twitter YouTube Instagram Reddit RSS Discord Patreon TikTok Twitch
  • Features


Send this to a friend
})