News

Filmmakers Pressure Alleged Pirate to Take Lie Detector in Court

Movie studio Voltage, the makers of the Oscar-winning Dallas Buyers Club – starring Matthew McConaughey as an AIDS sufferer who illegally sells medication to those similarly afflicted with the disease – loves to sue BitTorrent users. The company has filled over one hundred lawsuits in US Federal Courts against alleged pirates of Dallas Buyers Club, with many of the cases settling out of court following the payment of a fine.

The latest such instance involves a case brought against Michael Amhari of California. Voltage, the plaintiff, claims that defendant Amhari – identified following the studio obtaining his IP address – illegally downloaded a copy of Dallas Buyers Club via BitTorrent, and is demanding $10,000 in a settlement. After Amhari challenged the decision, pleading his innocence, the plaintiff’s counsel, James Davis, demanded that the defendant submits himself to a polygraph, or lie detector test. The plaintiff, however, began to backtrack on the offer to pay for the test after Amhari agreed to take it, with its plan to pressure the defendant into settling seemed to have backfired.

“Plaintiff demanded that defendant take a polygraph examination in exchange for a dismissal of the case. Plaintiff’s counsel disingenuously stated that he would bear all the costs for such a polygraph test,” Clay Renick, Amhari’s counsel, wrote in a court memorandum. “When plaintiff’s counsel then agreed to take such a test with the proviso that defense costs and attorney fees be covered, plaintiff then refused to pay costs and revoked his offer to conduct a polygraph.”

Renick cites the frivolous polygraph idea as just one example of misconduct on the part of plaintiff counsel Davis, branding the behaviour “galling”.

“After receiving exculpatory evidence and the sworn declaration of defendant, Mr. Davis then refused to file a dismissal and proceeded to demand that defendant appear in the action or he would file a default,” Renick added. “This behavior is galling and it should not be permitted by the court.”

Since, in the absence of the implied guilt that Amhari’s refusal to take a polygraph would have gifted the plaintiff, Voltage’s case rests purely on an IP address, Renick argues that the defendant’s guilt cannot be proven beyond reasonable doubt.

“This action is further proof of the malicious motives of plaintiff’s counsel who proceeds against an innocent defendant with nothing other than an IP-address to support his allegations,” wrote Renick.

Ashley Allen

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

Still Wakes the Deep 

LIVE THE HORROR: An immersive disaster story aboard a stunningly realised North Sea oil rig,…

4 hours ago

PHILIPS 275V8LA – 27 Inch QHD Monitor

The Philips VA LED display uses an advanced multi-domain vertical alignment technology that gives you…

4 hours ago

EPOMAKER Ajazz AK820 Pro 75% Gasket-mounted Mechanical Keyboard 

【TFT Screen: The Interactive Interface】This 75% mechanical keyboard comes equipped with a TFT Screen, serving…

4 hours ago

Funko Fusion

FANDOM FUSION Play as your favorite characters and wield their unique weapons and skills. Team…

4 hours ago

Shin Megami Tensei V: Vengeance Standard Edition

The Definitive Version of Shin Megami Tensei V - Fully evolved with stunning visuals for…

4 hours ago

Hand Warmers Rechargeable 2 Pack

【Unique Split Design】5200mAh hand warmers rechargeable together with double-sided heating function, split snap swivel design,…

4 hours ago