So with the imminent launch of the highly anticipated AMD Fury graphics cards, it was only a matter of time before someone accidentally published a review before the NDA. In this case, DigitalStorm dropped the ball.
As we all know, the AMD Fury range is based on the newest Fiji architecture and will feature High Bandwidth Memory v1. Previously rumoured to offer AMD R9 295×2 performance in a package as small as the NVIDIA GTX 970 ITX, this was set to be one of the best graphics card innovations in years.
We have covered a lot of news regarding the AMD R9 Fury range, how it should be a better performer than the Titan X, the same cost as a GTX 980, the same size as a GTX 970 ITX and water cooled like its older brother, the R9 295×2. However, solid performance details have been scarce with only one or two charts popping up and all contradicting each other.
We will keep this post updated as we get more details, so stay tuned to your F5 button.
Was this the performance you was expecting from the new AMD Fury X? Let us know in the comments.
Thank you to VideoCardz for providing us with this information
Electronic Arts (EA) announced today that its games were played for over 11 billion hours…
Steam's annual end-of-year recap, Steam Replay, provides fascinating insights into gamer habits by comparing individual…
GSC GameWorld released a major title update for STALKER 2 this seeking, bringing the game…
Without any formal announcement, Intel appears to have revealed its new Core 200H series processors…
Ubisoft is not having the best of times, but despite recent flops, the company still…
If you haven’t started playing STALKER 2: Heart of Chornobyl yet, now might be the…