To get an idea on the money side of things and how things did overall, it’s worth taking a look at the overall averages and the cost per frame. It’s here where the 4070 Ti SUPER does improve upon the non-SUPER in the averages by a lowly 5%. I get that being the same price, you could argue that any extra performance is a great thing to have, but at just 5%, most of that could be deemed as margin of error to a degree.
Also couple in the cost per frame where the Ti SUPER does come in better, but only by 3 cents per frame, which equates to about 0.4% so again, it makes you question what the point was overall of even having the card, but again, for the same price, is there really an argument?
What is clear is that there are other cards that are far superior in terms of value for money, like the RX 7900 XT. Sure it doesn’t have DLSS, but at $5.52 compared to $6.12 from NVIDIA, that’s quite a stark difference, or even NVIDIA’s own 4070 SUPER at $4.77, that’s where things get a lot more exciting.
NVIDIA has revealed the new games that support its latest graphics card technologies. We're talking…
The Apple M4 Max, the high-end option among the new Apple processors that launched in…
As Intel prepares to expand its Core Ultra 200 series of processors with “non-K” models,…
Baldur's Gate 3 is a success, and it seems redundant to say so, but what…
The Callisto Protocol on PS5 Pro reaches 8K at 30 fps with ray tracing enabled:…
Buying studios is a fairly common thing these days. However, in recent years, we've seen…