News

Intel Reportedly Outsourcing 14nm Chipset Production to TSMC

Intel Production Woes May Force Tough Choice

Just 5 years ago, Intel was the undisputed leader in silicon production. With the best in-house fabs, the company was at the forefront of the latest production nodes. Unfortunately, time has not been kind to the Intel frontrunner. Chipzilla has arguably fallen behind of some its competitors in the industry. According to a new report, Intel is planning to outsource some production to competing fabs. What many of us thought unthinkable may now be a reality. To be clear, it is unclear when this deal will be inked and production start rolling at this point.

The new report points to problems in keeping up with 14nm production. The real crux of the problem is due to the transition to 10nm. As part of their PAO plan, fabs leapfrog each other onto new process nodes. Some fabs may be on say 22nm, others on the main 14nm node and some on the testing 10nm node. With 10nm hung up, new chips aren’t moving away from 14nm. This is leading to more strain on 14nm production. Furthermore, along with the planned move away from older nodes, 14nm is facing more strain as chipsets on 22nm move to 14nm as well.

Unclear Which TSMC Process Intel May Use

As a result of this shortage, Intel has no option but to find ways to free up capacity somehow. Due to the importance of nodes to CPUs,  the company will reserve 14nm production for the CPUs. This leaves the chipsets which are arguably less important to manufactured elsewhere. TSMC is the logical choice as they are the go-to option for third-party production. While chipsets on say 16nm may not be ideal, it is probably better than 22nm. It also gives Intel the opportunity to move 22nm fabs to either 14nm or 10nm. The chipsets in question are the H310 as well as other 300 series chipsets.

With these troubles out in the open, the real question is how Intel will handle their fabs going forward. Due to the woes with 10nm, Intel CPUs have been stuck on 14nm for a very long time. Perhaps it may be time for Intel to consider using other fabs more often. As AMD once found out, while an in-house fab offers more overall flexibility, it comes with heavy risks, especially if you plan heavily on a specific timeline. As AMD is finding out with Globalfoundries and TSMC, having multiple fab partners may be the way to go.

Samuel Wan

Samuel joined eTeknix in 2015 after becoming engrossed in technology and PC hardware. With his passion for gaming and hardware, tech writing was the logical step to share the latest news with the world. When he’s not busy dreaming about the latest hardware, he enjoys gaming, music, camping and reading.

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 5090 Possible Price Revealed

According to a new report, the GeForce RTX 5090 GPU will be very expensive. It…

4 hours ago

AMD Krackan Processor with 6 Zen 5 and Zen 5c Cores for Budget AI Laptops Leaked

A new AMD processor in the form of an engineering model has been leaked in…

4 hours ago

SK Hynix Begins Production of First 321-Layer NAND Chips

SK Hynix has claimed to be the first company to mass-produce 321-layer NAND memory chips.…

4 hours ago

Trust Gaming GXT 609 Zoxa 2.0 PC Speakers

SOUNDS GREAT – Full stereo sound (12W peak power) gives your setup a booming audio…

9 hours ago

PowerA Wired Controller for Nintendo Switch

Special Edition Yoshi design Ergonomic controller shape with Nintendo Switch button layout Detachable 10ft (3m)…

9 hours ago

Logitech G Saitek PRO Flight Rudder Pedals

Fluid Motion: These flight rudder pedals are smooth and accurate that enable precise control over…

9 hours ago