Lexar JumpDrive S45 64GB USB 3.0 Flash Drive Review
Bohs Hansen / 8 years ago
Testing & Methodology
When testing a flash drive like this, then we’re interested in more than just the performance of an empty drive. Most NAND-based products are in some degree affected in their performance by the amount of capacity that has been used. That’s surely something most people have experience by now and the smaller the drive is, the more noticeable it will be.
To make these tests as thorough as possible and test how big the performance impact of a drive is through its fillage degree, I’ll be testing the drives empty as well as with 25%, 50%, and 75% data fillage. The flash drive will be tested with all the apps mentioned below at each of these stages and that should give us a great overall view of the drive and its performance.
I’ll be inserting screenshots from each test as well as a performance analysis charts and drive comparison charts on each of the following pages. The only application that is excempt, is the fillage tests is AIDA64. This is because its write tests require the drive to be unpartitioned. AIDA does give us a great look at the drive with other tests and built-in benchmark graphing.
Benchmark System:
- Gigabyte GA-Z170X-Gaming 7-EU
- Intel Core i5-6600K
- EVGA GTX 980 SC
- Kingston Fury DDR4 2400MHz 32GB
- Samsung SM951 NVMe 256GB in RAID 0
- be quiet! Dark Power Pro 10 850W
- Thermaltake Water 3.0 Ultimate
Software
- AIDA64 Storage Benchmark
- Anvil’s Storage Utilities
- ATTO Benchmark
- AS SSD
- CrystalDiskMark
