Noctua NF-P14 FLX Fan
Andy Ruffell / 14 years ago
Motherboard: Asus M4A785TD-M Evo
Memory (RAM): 4GB Crucial 1600 MHz DDR3
Graphics Card: MSI Nvidia 9500 GT (Operating Dual display)
Primary Hard Drive: OCZ Vertex II 60gb SSD
Power Supply and Case: iCute Case + 600watt PSU
Operating System: Windows 7 Home Edition 64-bit
Testing Method
In line with previous fan testing we will use the same method as previous Noctua and Gelid fans. As such the testing procedure used to obtain the results was simple but effective, using CPU temperatures to show how effective the fans are at efficiently moving heated air through a high performance heatsink. This was done by fitting the fan being tested onto the Akasa Venom heatsink previously reviewed. Lower temperatures mean the fan is pushing more air and therefore has higher performance; the noise levels will also be rated as this is of course the area all Noctua fans are well regarded.
The AMD X4 965 3.4 GHz processor was set to stock speeds. The test will help to show how the Noctua fan copes against competing 120mm fans. The fans themselves are connected to a 4 Pin Molex to 3 Pin adapter to ensure they are provided with the full 12v at all times and RPM is monitored with the sensor cable connected to the CPU fan socket. CPU Smart Fan Control (PWM) was completely disabled in the BIOS to ensure it does not alter the fans RPM through the sensor cable.
Software Used
To Load the CPU:
One of the best overclocking stability testing programs is LinX, it pushes hardware harder than more well-known software like Prime95. It produces higher max temperatures than anything else I have used, which is perfect for what we need here. We are using the latest version and the settings used are All Memory Run for 20 Minutes which loads both the CPU to 100% and the memory to a very high usage point.
To Monitor Temperatures and Fan Speeds:
From the makers of CPU-Z, which is one of the most popular CPU information and overclock validation software comes the well-known HWMonitor. This software offers excellent compatibility and accuracy from Windows and I’m using the latest version in the 64bit flavour. RPM values were also verified via the BIOS.
Recording Results:
To ensure that the results are accurate, each test is run three times and an average is taken from the resulting values. The system is allowed to cool for 10 minutes between tests and the room temperature is monitored to make sure that it does not change enough to affect the results. The room temperature remained between 21.9 and 22.1 (degrees C) throughout the testing. The temperate of the individual cores were also recorded individually and averaged out to give the most reliable results.