News

Samsung Ranked Second in 1,000 in R&D Spendings

As according to Fortune magazine, Samsung has been ranked in consultancy firm ‘Strategy & Global Innovation’s’ top 1,000 list of 2013 in expenditure in Research and Development. According to their data, R & D expenses of these companies were up to $647 billion US in 2013 – a $9 billion US increase in 2012’s results.

These 1,000 top ranked companies accounted for two fifths of total global R & D expenditure, with health care and the computer industry accounting for 50% of the total sum. Other heavily invested industries included that of the automotive and software fields. Below we will list for you the top 10 ranked companies, thanks to CNBeta.

  1. Volkswagen – $13.5 Billion spent at 5.2% total revenue ratio
  2. Samsung – $13.4 Billion spent at 6.4% revenue ratio
  3. Intel – $10.6 Billion spent at 20.1% revenue ratio
  4. Microsoft – $10.4 billion spent at 13.5% revenue ratio
  5. Roche – $10 billion spent at 19% revenue ratio
  6. Novartis – $9.9 billion spent at 16.8% revenue ratio
  7. Toyota – $9.1 billion spent at 3.5% revenue ratio
  8. Johnson & Johnson – $8.2 billion spent at 11.5% revenue ratio
  9. Google – $8 billion spent at 13.2% revenue ratio
  10. Merck – $9.9 billion spent at 17% revenue ratio

It’s interesting to note Intel’s massive revenue ratio coming in to play in this situation – ranking at double many of this lists reported percentages. Samsung’s massive R & D expenditure for 2013 is said to be due to their Smart TV monitors and services, alongside their plans to develop into three departments: Business Development, Institute and Samsung’s Advanced Institute of Technology. They also already have R & D centers spread across Silicon Valley, Bangalore and Bejing.

I personally didn’t expect Samsung to rank so high in the scheme of things and definitely did not expect Volkswagen to hit number one. If nothing else, the list can at least instill some confidence in the consumer that these companies are trying to better their products more than anyone else – or does it mean that they’re trying to better their products just by throwing money at them? It’s up to you to decide.

Image courtesy of Chiphell

Chris Smith

Disqus Comments Loading...

Recent Posts

Phil Spencer Is Against Expansions That Are “Manipulative” and Cut From Base Games

Phil Spencer has spoken out against what he calls "manipulative expansions"—additional content derived from material…

22 hours ago

Razer Launches USB 4 Dock for Gaming and Productivity

Razer has introduced the USB 4 Dock, a high-performance accessory designed to combine ultra-fast data…

1 day ago

RTX 50 Will Seize the Whole Market Starting in December, Says GPU Cooling Supplier

A major supplier of GPU cooling components has indicated that we could see the arrival…

1 day ago

MSI MEG X870E GODLIKE Motherboard Hits Stores for $1,099

MSI first unveiled its top-tier AM5 motherboard, the MEG X870E GODLIKE, in August this year.…

1 day ago

Anker SOLIX C1000 Portable Power Station

80% UltraFast Recharging in 43 Minutes: Be ready for adventure in 43 minutes (100% in…

1 day ago

ASUS TUF Gaming FX707VI 17.3″ Full HD 144Hz Gaming Laptop

Powered by Intel's 13th Generation i7-13620H 10 Core Processor Dedicated NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 (140…

1 day ago