✨ We've just launched our NEW website design!

Learn More Here
Graphics Cards

Sapphire Nitro+ RX 470 OC Graphics Card Review

Testing & Methodology


Here is the test system we used for all graphics card reviews and game performance analysis:

Hardware

Additional Hardware

  • “Killawatt” style electricity usage meter wall plug
  • Precision Gold N05CC Decibel meter

Drivers

The latest drivers are always used at the time of testing, but please note reviews undergo a scheduling process. This means a new driver could be released on the day of publication. However, this is unavoidable and disclosing the driver versions used is the most transparent way of informing the reader about current performance levels.

Untitled

Games 

Throughout the testing procedure, we always use demanding presets to stress graphics cards to their absolute limits. However, in the interest of fairness, any technology which favours either AMD or NVIDIA is disabled. More specifically, this refers to PhysX, Hairworks and more. Additionally, we also disable all forms of AA to gauge performance levels which aren’t impacted by complex AA. Theoretically, we could have employed FXAA because it only has a minor impact on the frame-rate, but many users strongly dislike the hazy image this causes. Apart from the details mentioned above, all settings remain at the maximum values. On another note, we previously used Grand Theft Auto V in the testing process and it’s a popular title. However, there’s been some strange anomalies in the minimum frame-rate which mean I’m not confident in the benchmark’s accuracy.

Since I’ve taken the helm as graphics card reviewer, I wanted to put fairness at the heart of each article and ensure there’s a good balance between DirectX 11 and DirectX 12 games. This allows us to properly analyse each graphics card as focussing on sponsored titles from a particular vendor will always result in an inaccurate picture. Unfortunately, popular monitoring software like FRAPS cannot display the frame-rate in real time and poses a problem when observing performance numbers. Thankfully, it’s still possible to use FRAPS’s Min/Avg/Max function which we’ve found offers the most reliable monitoring compared to other methods. If you have any suggestions to aid the benchmarking process, please let us know so we can constantly improve the procedure.

Selecting strenuous presets especially at higher resolutions can cause hitching and other performance problems on graphics cards with lower amounts of video memory. For example, Rise of the Tomb Raider’s Very High textures really requires 6GB of RAM to maintain a smooth frame-rate. In theory, we could run the benchmarks at the High setting but this defeats the purpose of high-end graphics cards which are designed to cope with the absolute best graphics on the market. Furthermore, the notion of enthusiast cards sporting less than 6GB memory will become less of an issue in the future. Of course, whenever we’re tackling more affordable GPUs, the settings will be altered accordingly.

To reiterate, all settings are set to their maximum values apart from AA and vendor exclusive technologies. Sometimes, selecting the maximum preset doesn’t combine all the best settings, so we double check these and manually confirm the highest graphical preset has been enabled.  The only one important aspect to mention revolves around Exclusive FullScreen in Rise of the Tomb Raider. Judging by the thorough testing, the frame-rate is much better when using this particular mode.

Software

Synthetic Benchmarks

During our testing, we use a range of readily available synthetic benchmarking tools which are free to download from the respective websites. We do this so the readers can download and compared to our results. Download links are contained within the “Software” subheading.

Noise

Everyone has their own reasonable noise level when it comes to comes to components in a computer. Some can handle all fans at 100% load to keep temperatures down, some want a completely silent computer. To properly gauge the noise output of a graphics card, we position a Precision Gold N05CC Decibel meter from two metres away and take an average reading.

Power Consumption

With electricity becoming increasingly expensive across most parts of the world the need for computer components to become power efficient has never been more relevant. Graphics cards are often the most power-hungry components of a desktop system so having an efficient graphics card is very important to keeping power bills under control. Power is often correlated to heat and so lower power consumption means a graphics card is likely to run slightly cooler and put out less heat into your system meaning your other components will run cooler with improved longevity. AMD and NVIDIA have both made power consumption an integral part of the way graphics cards dynamically overclock so the need for graphics card vendors to use efficient VRM and PCB designs is becoming important to maximise performance. We take power readings after 5 minutes of two different load scenarios: desktop idle and Unigine Heaven load.

Temperatures

The cooling solution which graphics card vendors choose to implement is one of the main differences that consumers have to contend with when choosing a graphics cards. Apart from their acoustic properties, the thermal properties of graphics card coolers are extremely important. Lower temperatures are always better and with AMD and NVIDIA opting to use dynamic overclocking algorithms that take temperature into account it is important that graphics card vendors use high-performance cooling solutions in order to maximise performance. The era of graphics cards reaching dangerous temperatures are now in the past but the importance of lower temperatures still remains. Lower temperatures mean better stability, longer component longevity and lower fan speeds .We take temperature readings after 5 minutes of two different load scenarios: desktop idle and Unigine Heaven load. We always record actual temperatures and make any adjustments for changes in the thermal testing environment.

Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13Next page

Related Articles

32 Comments

  1. Nice review! The performance gap between 470 and 480 is not more than 10%, but 470 is 30% cheaper than the 480 and overclocked 470 come close the 480. 470 got great value for money. Powercooler 470 seems like much better than the Sapphire Nitro.

    1. Hey, thank you for the kind words. Yeah, there’s not a lot in it performance wise, and I think it will be a very solid option once the price comes down a little bit.

  2. Impressive Vulkan results versus the 1060. Let’s hope future Vulkan and DX12 games perform similarly.

        1. Go with a 470 4gb, especially at the current price level.. then add another in a few months… give it a friend to play with!

          1. Will see. Can’t wait to put my R9 270X in deserved retirement. For CF 8 gig looks better.

    1. If the non-reference 4GB RX480s were in stock, they would be worth the $20 premium for the extra shaders and CUs. I want the Sapphire Nitro+ 4G RX480 for $230, but out of stock….However the RX470 is in stock.

        1. Yes, some are in stock, but at terrible prices as you said. After 2 days of looking for a 480 8gb (or even a 4gb) at a decent price, but was let down everywhere I went. I’m not paying $300+ for this card. I finally “settled” for a 470 4Gb for $211 on Amazon. ASUS STRIX OC. I nearly gave up, but I’ve had a lowly GT 720 in my PC for a year now. I built backwards, but wanted a stable foundation to work with first (budget). Now I want to game.

          1. There’s not enough of a performance difference to justify another $70. I paid $189 for a 470 with what, 4 less shaders? than the $270 needed for the 480. This 470 plays every game I throw at it with ultra+ settings. I feel just fine about the choice. And I’ve had it for a while now, I didn’t have to wait. I’m not going to be a victim of price gouging. The 470’s O.C. nicely. I run mine at 1350 GPU clock / 1850 mem clk. and game on one monitor with a movie on the other, and I barely hit 68°. There’s still plenty of room. Same clocks and mem as the 480.

  3. Looks like the Nitro got a very decent amount of overclocking headroom, and the Sapphire cooling solution is very impressive too. Thanks for the solid review.

    1. Hi , and this can be the case even if buy my card hey ? i dont need
      to stay ina certain part of the world to be special? Im just asking… i
      hate to buy something and then its a failure. I have 4 cards i cant
      decide on and so many mixed reviews. There is a Gigabyte gaming graphics card and an ASUS Strix edition
      card that is on my list also…. but something tells me the Saphire
      Nitro 4GB is just fine… am i right ?

  4. I have my card pushed to 1400mhz on the core and 2200 on the memory at stock voltages. I guess I won the lottery 🙂

    1. Hi , and this can be the case even if buy my card hey ? i dont need to stay ina certain part of the world to be special? Im just asking… i hate to buy something and then its a failure. I have 4 cards i cant decide on and so many mixed reviews. There is a Gigabyte and an ASUS card that is on my list also…. but something tells me the Saphire Nitro 4GB is just fine… am i right ?

      1. The sapphire is in my opinion the best 470 you can buy. After overclocking It runs hotter and may be a little bit louder, but it will crush 1080p gaming. As for the gigabyte one, I saw a review on a gigabyte rx480 and it was pretty bad compared to other brands. The Asus will run much cooler and quieter as the core clock, power draw limit(only a 6 pin pcie) and throttling are heavily controlled by Asus to keep it at around 60-65c. Ultimately I’ll say it like this, if you want a top preforming card and don’t care about heat then get the sapphire, I can honestly say I love it, if you want a cool and quiet card but are willing to Sacramento performance then go for Asus. Also sapphire has a damn sexy back plate whereas Asus does not have one at all. On the topic of how your card will oc, I have no clue. I think it’s honestly just luck, I don’t think it matters where in the world you live.

        1. i just bought this GPUbut it’s 8GB instead. It’s great! gives excellent performance. I can play watch dogs 2 on high settings 1080p 60+FPS.
          it’s very hot on stock config, i dont even touch the OC and bios switch

  5. Is this card 6 or 8 pin power and does this make a difference? i am just asking since some guy on a forum once told me he would straiught up go for PowerCOlor brand over the HIS brand because it has an 8pin connector rather than a 6pin connector.

    1. This card has an 8pin. Power draw on mine doesn’t go over ~135w under full load when OCed to 1400mhz (no overvolt just 50% power limit). Which is 20watts less than what the 6 pin can deliver (75w through pcie and 75 through 6pin) so the 225w of total available power that you have with the 8 pin is arguably unnecessary. But my best guess is that the 8pin will give it better stability when overclocked and just in case you sometime manage to hit 150w while over volting then you have the extra power.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker!   eTeknix prides itself on supplying the most accurate and informative PC and tech related news and reviews and this is made possible by advertisements but be rest assured that we will never serve pop ups, self playing audio ads or any form of ad that tracks your information as your data security is as important to us as it is to you.   If you want to help support us further you can over on our Patreon!   Thank you for visiting eTeknix