The problem with legal disputes about the internet is that judges generally do not have a clue about how things work. UK site SurfTheChannel is a prime example of this. The site hosted links to a wide variety of videos to other sites on the internet, some of these were copyright infringing but with so many links it is only possible to take those down when they are reported. The site did not host any video content, it only acted as very specialised search engine for TV and film content.
The MPAA and FACT, the local anti-piracy group, hated SurfTheChannel so much that it hired a private detective to go into the site owner’s house and snoop around.They then got the police (paid for at the UK Tax Payer’s expense) to complete their dirty work, raid his house and bring him into custody.
He has now been sentenced to 4 years in jail for nothing more than being a miniature Google – in official legal speak that translates as conspiracy to defraud. Thousands of websites all over the internet link out to copyright infringing sites but go unnoticed yet when a big media company or copyright protection organisation wants a scapegoat, it normally gets one.
Censorship of the internet is wrong. Taking down this site was wrong. And we hope the MPAA and FACT gets what coming to them.
Plaion, a leading video game publisher, and Retro Games Ltd., a specialist in reimagined classic…
During the latest earnings call, NVIDIA CFO Colette Kress warned of a potential GPU supply…
Chinese sources say the GeForce RTX 5090, RTX 5080, RTX 5070 Ti, and RTX 5070…
GTA 6 doesn’t have an official release date yet, but it has already earned a…
Stay on Point with ActiveTrack 6.0 - With upgraded tracking tech, OM 6 sticks to…
Pack includes three Wiser Radiator Thermostats. These smart radiator thermostats are only designed to work…