✨ We've just launched our NEW website design!

Learn More Here
Graphics Cards

XFX AMD R9 Fury X 4GB Graphics Card Review

3DMark


3dmark13

“The new 3DMark includes everything you need to benchmark your hardware. With three all new tests you can bench everything from smartphones and tablets, to notebooks and home PCs, to the latest high-end, multi-GPU gaming desktops. And it’s not just for Windows. With 3DMark you can compare your scores with Android and iOS devices too. It’s the most powerful and flexible 3DMark we’ve ever created.” From Futuremark.com

firestrike1

firestrike2

firestrike3

Our first test nets interesting results, the Fury X starts to pull ahead at higher resolutions, with only the Titan X keeping the lead at 4K.

Previous page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16Next page

Related Articles

8 Comments

  1. Why arkham Knight? not to mention no setting shown for it too. Perhaps you guys should benchmark The Witcher 3 instead of arkham knight. I sure hope amd will release a much better driver for fury x. Sad to see a new architecture(hbm) falling behind an old architechture(GDDR5). So much promise yet so much disappointment.

    1. Arkham Knight has been withdrawn by Warner Brothers as the programming is seriously flawed. It is unplayable on DX11. WB will be releasing AK with a DX12 port and patch.

  2. So basically if you are gaming at 1440p or 4K this is worth serious consideration I am a little surprised at the price point, I did expect it to be a little cheaper being an AMD card but things do look promising for team red.

    Unfortunately for me all of my gaming is done at 1080p so I personally would buy the 980Ti. Still I am interested in seeing where AMD take HBM.

  3. @ Rikki Wright

    When you last wrote about DX12 benchmarks you pointed out that Radeon 290x was 33% faster than GeForce 980Ti and as fast as Titan X.

    So Fury should be 20% faster than Titan X and 50% faster than 980 Ti.

    Right? You know, you ran the benchmarks already yet you aren’t telling us.

    Peter Odonnell rote this piece 4 months ago.

    www dot eteknix.com/amd-r9-290x-goes-head-to-head-with-titan-x-with-dx12/

    Your own site knows that nVidia GPU’s are drastically slower than AMD using DX12 yet you lie to your readers by omitting these very important facts.

    Don’t consumers have a right to make educated buying choices?

  4. With DX12 Fury x is 50% faster than GTX 980 Ti and crushes Titan X.

    nVidia does not have Asynchronous Shader Pipelines nor do they have Asynchronous Compute Engine IP.

    nVidia is great with an obsolete API. But it is absolute trash with Mantle or DX12.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker!   eTeknix prides itself on supplying the most accurate and informative PC and tech related news and reviews and this is made possible by advertisements but be rest assured that we will never serve pop ups, self playing audio ads or any form of ad that tracks your information as your data security is as important to us as it is to you.   If you want to help support us further you can over on our Patreon!   Thank you for visiting eTeknix